ЗАПРОВАДЖЕННЯ ВРОПЕЙСЬКИХ ПРИНЦИПІВ СУДОВОГО РОЗГЛЯДУ СПОРІВ ЯК ВАЖЛИВИЙ НАПРЯМОК ВДОСКОНАЛЕННЯ ГОСПОДАРСЬКОГО ПРОЦЕСУ

Abstract

Principles are called internal beliefs people, those practical, moral and theoretical ambush, which are seen in life, in various spheres of activity. In scientific principles, there are the main ambush, wildly requirements until the theory, formulated as the first thing that underlies the singing totality of facts. When characterizing different systems, it is important to consider those essential characteristics, which are responsible for the correct functioning of the system, without which they would not win their recognition. In the case of judiciary, then there are different principles that regulate yoga activity (procedural principles). To the rest (and the stink itself is the subject of our research) we can see: the availability of the judicial protection of rights and legitimate interests; equal rights of the parties to the state process; freedom of giving them their own evidence and bringing before the court their conflicts; legality; sleep; lack of mediation; competitiveness; dispositivity; look at the right one-specially or collegially) and specific or special (review of the court's decisions etc. ). The analysis of the new procedural legislation allows us to draw conclusions about the presence of some and the same principles in different procedural codes. This is explained by the fact thatthey were prepared by different groups of fahivtsiv locally, without any prior restrictions on the concept of change to the procedural codes of Ukraine. Tobto, there is a lack of control over the duplication of norms in procedural legislation. It would be necessary to increase the principles that are repeated in different procedural codes and include them (as a universal principle) to a larger normative legal act. Before any normative-legal sequence, it also includes one principle, which is, for the most part, one of the most important. This is the principle of public respect to judges and judges by society. This principle stems from the presumption of impartiality of judges and consists in a friendly, loyal attitude towards judicial authorities and their employees, trust in their professional knowledge and awareness of the judge's determination to comply with moral and ethical standards.